Last updated on May 29, 2021
Green Leaders Modern green society requires agile and democratic leaders. Agile leaders are inclusive leaders who show significant openness to new ideas and innovations. They are passionate about learning and developing other people. In addition, they have strong skills to redefine and communicate new visions by helping their institutions become agents of change. Under the circumstances, agile leaders can turn to one style or another of leadership as needed by the goals of the company or institutions. Agile leaders should: 1. Have a clear vision 2. Believe in your mission and live to implement it 3. Focus on the fundamentals, facilitating and delivering excellence 4. Your goals should inspire others to contribute and make these their own goals 5. Change your style as needed to meet business goals For agile leaders, the most important thing is to foster a culture that supports experimentation, learning, and the constant search for good results and better ways to achieve them. The challenge for agile leaders is that they cannot dictate culture; they can only create the right conditions for her to be born from the team. Leaders can’t control all elements or factors; however, they can help them as a team can be managed. Discovering and recognizing the skills of others and using them is a daily task for modern leaders. Therefore, agile leaders play an important, even elementary, role in the scale agility of the new world. In addition, modern societies need agile leaders to frame the right goals, embrace and reward learning, and motivate people rather than frighten them. Leadership therefore strengthens and strengthens people and vice versa. As a business owner, you are free to assume any style of leadership you want. You can be an autocrat and do things your way, or you can be a visionary and inspire your followers. When you think about business management, jazz can seem like a strange place to find leadership lessons. But jazz bands (also known as “big” bands) are a great example of how agile leadership can work. Let’s take a typical ensemble, for example, usually composed of at least ten musicians (each playing a different instrument), a jazz band is often led by a conductor or band leader responsible for integrating the various sounds and harmonies into a cohesive production – exactly as in a new company. However, what makes a jazz ensemble truly agile and democratic is that, within the framework of scores, every musician – at specific points – is also given the freedom to improvise and show his creative side, just as a democratic leader allows his employees to contribute their thoughts and ideas. Unfortunately, the jazz band’s example also illustrates the difficulty of keeping things on track as a democratic leader. Since many different sounds are emerging from the band, a hercules amount of coordination and cooperation is needed to produce music that is pleasing to the ears; within your company, you’ll need to exercise similar leadership attributes to keep your strategies consistent and targeted. Traditional leadership practices are outdated and ineffective in today’s world. Research has shown that more than 70% of people are actively disengaged, and bad leaders are the number one cause of their dissatisfaction. But it doesn’t have to be like this. Agile and democratic leadership is a completely new approach for leaders, who are engaging their people, revitalizing their institutions, and changing the practice of how jobs, tasks, and processes are done. The autocratic and bureaucratic leadership style is the traditional structure of bosses and workers, where management makes most decisions and workers do what they are asked to do. This leadership style is suitable for highly complex projects, such as the development of the COVID vaccine, where compliance is necessary for worker safety and project completion. However, if a style of autocratic leadership is misused, workers can become highly dissatisfied and feel that their presence is completely useless. The bureaucratic and authoritarian leadership style is based on the positions that people occupy within their organizations and companies to perfectly outline their responsibilities, rules and regulations within the organization. This is because bureaucratic leadership can be seen as a system with multiple levels of management, each reporting at the level above it. The cons of this style are that it is quite hierarchical, and workers or managers at the lower level have difficulty expressing good ideas or contributions to those responsible, as they often have to travel through a vast chain of management and bureaucracy.